Subject: Kudos

From: kyz
Date: Thu May 18 10:39:13 2006

To: UADE-Developer-discussion
Apart from these messages I'm posting which might look like complaints, I am really pleased with the work that went into the UADE 2.x series. Most impressive of all is making UADE's core a shared library. The code is also much more nicely structured and simplified. And, of course, I really appreciate it every time more music gets supported or detected. You are almost giving DeliTracker and EaglePlayer a run for their money :)

---

From: shd
Date: Sat May 20 10:50:39 2006

To: UADE-Developer-discussion
[quote:a34746d293="kyz"]Apart from these messages I'm posting which might look like complaints, I am really pleased with the work that went into the UADE 2.x series.
[/quote:a34746d293]

Ehm. I like bug reports. They're always good news. If I don't get any bug reports there's no progress.

[quote:a34746d293]Most impressive of all is making UADE's core a shared library.[/quote:a34746d293]

But it isn't. We made it a separate executable process that is communicated with by using pipes.

[quote:a34746d293] The code is also much more nicely structured and simplified. 
[/quote:a34746d293]

Yes, we changed things a lot because the 1.x model was unmaintainable.

Other benefits of uade 2.xx are better postprocessing effects, very realistic sound filter (affects sound output always), superior audio resampling from Paula to 44,1 kHz (or any other freq in the current CVS version), superior command line tool (uade123), better documentation (man page), song and player specific configuration management (see song.conf and eagleplayer.conf with current CVS version).

uade 1.xx loses on any front.